Danny Sheehan - UAP Disclosure Act 2.0 - Part 1 || That UFO Podcast
That UFO Podcast That UFO Podcast
33.2K subscribers
13,516 views
0

 Published On Premiered Apr 22, 2024

Andy is joined by Director of the New Paradigm Institute & very well known lawyer in the UFO community, Daniel Sheehan for over 90 minutes to discuss:

- Where the UAP Disclosure Act went wrong last time
- The wins from the last attempt
- Why this time will be different
- Nuclear conflict drawing out the others?
- Outside influences on the Disclosure movement
- Whistleblowers, their backgrounds, & more
- Worst case scenario planning
- Listener Questions
And much, much more..!

Check out Danny's organisation: https://newparadigminstitute.org/

Don't forget to subscribe, like, and leave a review of the show.

Cheers,
Andy & Dan

* * *
GET IN TOUCH
Email Andy: [email protected]
Email Dan: [email protected]
Andy's social links: https://linktr.ee/ufouapam
Dan's social links: https://linktr.ee/TheZignal
* * *
T-SHIRTS, HOODIES, MUGS, AND OTHER SHOW MERCHANDISE: https://www.redbubble.com/people/ToIn...
* * *
- Join this channel to get access to perks:
   / @thatufopodcast  
- Patreon http://bitly.ws/kvIE
- Apple Podcasts http://bitly.ws/kvIF
- Spotify http://bitly.ws/kvIH
* * *
CHAPTER
00:00:05 Intro
00:01:15 Dannys confidence in the UAPDA 2.0
00:10:10 Is the UFO / UAP subject above the law?
00:12:22 Outside influences on Disclosure process
00:20:00 Would any Non-Human presence interfere to stop Nuclear war?
00:32:00 What sort of backgrounds will future whistleblowers be from?
00:34:45 A floodgate of whistleblowers to break the dam?
00:38:00 What statements may we potentially hear from whistleblowers?
* * *
MUSIC
Girl with the Saucer Eyes - Adam Goldsack http://bitly.ws/kvIK
Goblin Problems - Sean Cahill http://bitly.ws/kvIL
* * *
FAIR USE NOTICE
This video may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. That UFO Podcast distributes this material for the purpose of news reporting, educational research, comment, and criticism, constituting Fair Use under 17 U.S.C § 107.

show more

Share/Embed